Linear integration
complete
Nick Omeyer
complete
Nick Omeyer
in progress
Nick Omeyer
planned
Nick Omeyer
under review
Nick Omeyer
Hey Vladimir Sorokin, thanks for reaching out 🙌
How important is this integration to you? I've noticed that you've tested out the product but haven't done much since then, is that because the Linear integration is key for you and your team?
If so, would you be up for a short chat with us to tell us more about your use case to make sure we design the integration properly?
Thank you 🙏
V
Vladimir Sorokin
Nick Omeyer: I think it's a blocker, as it's not easy to introduce another tool, when there are a lot of tools in use already.
What I like about Stepsize is your integration in day-to-day tools (IDE, slack), which is pretty seamless.
However, it will require us to manually create in our tracker/planner (Linear) / close issues in Stepsize after the issue is closed in Linear.
Nick Omeyer
Vladimir Sorokin: Understood, thank you 👍 Looking forward to the chat on the 28th!
V
Vladimir Sorokin
Nick Omeyer: 👍
Nick Omeyer
Hey Vladimir Sorokin 👋 We've had a closer look at this and there isn't really anything simple enough that we could do to facilitate an integration with Linear today.
It's definitely on our roadmap, but closer to the last few months of the year than to today.
Sorry about that 😣 It might be worth introducing Stepsize to your teammates nonetheless, but if you'd rather wait for the Linear integration I totally understand 🙏
V
Vladimir Sorokin
Nick Omeyer: Thank you for the response and the quick check.
I think that the main friction will be around the issue creation outside of Stepsize, so the complete integration with Linear can be skipped.
As I mentioned, having a simple webhook on issue creation in Stepsize could be a great improvement for us, as we'll be able to implement the automation ourselves.
We'll definitely try to use Stepsize nonetheless and will see how does it work for us.
Please, keep me posted if something changes:).